|
|
 |
|
CASE REPORT |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 19
| Issue : 1 | Page : 59-61 |
|
A case of gastric adenocarcinoma extirpated with total gastrectomy involving jejunal pouch reconstruction
Mohan Nayak Guguloth1, Sai Kiran Kuchana1, Tarun Kumar Suvvari2, Anthony Reddy Gopu1, Rohith Kode1
1 Department of General Surgery, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana, India 2 Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
Date of Submission | 14-Nov-2021 |
Date of Decision | 28-Jan-2022 |
Date of Acceptance | 01-Feb-2022 |
Date of Web Publication | 24-Feb-2022 |
Correspondence Address: Tarun Kumar Suvvari Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/am.am_134_21
Gastric adenocarcinoma usually has a poor prognosis due to its late diagnosis in most cases. Gastric adenocarcinomas account for 95% of all malignant tumors of the stomach. In this report, we described a case of a 63-year-old man who presented with pain in the epigastric region for 1 month which was associated with hematemesis and loss of appetite. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) revealed an ulcer of size 3 cm × 3 cm in the lesser curvature of the stomach. The patient underwent open total gastrectomy, dissection D2, and a jejunal pouch of 30 ml additional capacity was created 20 cm distal to duodenojejunal flexure and passed retrocolic from a rent in transverse mesocolon. The patient was sent to chemoradiotherapy after the surgery and discharged on the 24th day after surgery. Postoperative biopsy revealed tumor tissue showing irregular, ill-defined, and glandular clouding with loss of polarity. Infiltration was up to the muscularis layer and mesenteric lymph nodes showed partial effacement of architecture with reactive changes and few multinucleated foreign body giant cells confirming the diagnosis as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach of II B class (T2 N2 M0) as per the Union for International Cancer Control guidelines.
Keywords: Gastric adenocarcinoma, jejunal pouch reconstruction, open total gastrectomy
How to cite this article: Guguloth MN, Kuchana SK, Suvvari TK, Gopu AR, Kode R. A case of gastric adenocarcinoma extirpated with total gastrectomy involving jejunal pouch reconstruction. Apollo Med 2022;19:59-61 |
How to cite this URL: Guguloth MN, Kuchana SK, Suvvari TK, Gopu AR, Kode R. A case of gastric adenocarcinoma extirpated with total gastrectomy involving jejunal pouch reconstruction. Apollo Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 22];19:59-61. Available from: https://www.apollomedicine.org/text.asp?2022/19/1/59/338426 |
Introduction | |  |
Gastric carcinoma was commonly seen during the fifth to seventh decades of life.[1] About 90% of all tumors are malignant in which adenocarcinomas account for 95% of all malignant tumors of the stomach.[2] The potential curative approach for patients with gastric carcinoma is their early detection through screening and radical resection, most commonly a total or subtotal gastrectomy with accompanying lymphadenectomy.[3],[4]
The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) classifications are effectively used for analyzing the stage of cancer and determining the best treatment modality.[5] The reconstruction modalities include Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy and jejunal pouch reconstruction. The latter was found to be more effective and better for patient compliance.[6]
In patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma, the 5-year survival is roughly 10% only. Long-term survival in patients with gastric carcinoma is closely related to the stage of disease and its anatomical location.[7],[8]
Case Report | |  |
A 63-year-old male patient presented with pain in the epigastric region for 1 month which was insidious in onset, progressive in nature, and aggravated during nights. It was also associated with hematemesis, loss of appetite, and melena.
On physical examination, there was tenderness in the right hypochondrium. The workup included the UGIE which revealed an ulcer of size 3 cm × 3 cm [Figure 1] in the lesser curvature of the stomach. Endoscopy-guided biopsy revealed poorly differentiated, diffusely infiltrating atypical cells having moderate pleomorphism with an eccentric nucleus and abundant pale cytoplasm suggestive of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. | Figure 1: An ulcer of size 3 × 3 in the lesser curvature of the stomach removed by surgical resection
Click here to view |
The patient was thoroughly investigated radiologically to rule out metastasis, and then the patient was electively undertaken for surgery after improving nutritional status. The patient underwent open total gastrectomy, dissection D2, and jejunal pouch of 30 ml additional capacity was created 20 cm distal to duodenojejunal flexure and passed retrocolic from a rent in transverse mesocolon [Figure 2]. The jejunal pouch was anastomosed to the distal esophageal stump by esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy was done 10 cm distal to the former. | Figure 2: Open total gastrectomy was performed and a jejunal pouch of 30 ml additional capacity was created the jejunal pouch was anastomosed to the distal esophageal stump by esophagojejunostomy and finally jejunojejunostomy was done
Click here to view |
Postoperative biopsy revealed tumor tissue showing irregular, ill-defined, and glandular clouding with loss of polarity. Individual cells showed marked nuclear atypia with ill-defined cell margins and few signet ring cells [Figure 3]. Infiltration was up to the muscularis layer and mesenteric lymph nodes showed partial effacement of architecture with reactive changes and few multinucleated foreign body giant cells confirming the diagnosis as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach of II B class (T2 N2 M0) as per the UICC guidelines [Figure 4]. | Figure 3: Tumor tissue showing irregular, ill-defined, and glandular clouding with loss of polarity and individual cells showing marked nuclear atypia with ill-defined cell margins and few signet ring cells
Click here to view |
 | Figure 4: Infiltration can be seen up to muscularis layer and mesenteric lymph nodes showed partial effacement and few multinucleated foreign body giant cells confirming the diagnosis as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of stomach
Click here to view |
The postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was sent to chemoradiotherapy and discharged on the 24th day after surgery. The patient was followed up for 3 months and is still under follow-up and there were no complaints. The patient has not undergone any neoadjuvent chemotherapy.
Discussion | |  |
Gastric carcinoma is the fourth most common malignancy worldwide and remains the second cause of death of all malignancies worldwide.[1] The age commonly presented being early 50s and 60s with a male preponderance. The development of endoscopic techniques has improved the proportion of gastric cancers detected at an early stage and hence decreasing cancer-related morbidity. It allows direct visualization of tumor location, mucosal involvement, and biopsy for tissue diagnosis.[9],[10] In our case, we first worked on UGIE and confirmed the diagnosis by a guided biopsy.
The surgical resection procedure in resectable gastric cancers is determined by the location and size of the lesion and is also achievable free of margin of tissue after resection.[1] In a study conducted by Heberer G et al., in Europe, he demonstrated that 44% of surgeons prefer total gastrectomy for improved tumor clearance and decrease the recurrence rate.[11]
The involvement of regional lymph nodes ranges from 3% to 5% of tumors extending to the mucosa, 16% to 25% in cases extending to the submucosa, and 80% to 90% beyond the submucosa.[12] In our case, the decision was taken to perform an extended lymph node dissection (D2). Retrospective studies from Japan, involving 10,000 patients, support that extended lymph node dissection combined with gastrectomy prolongs survival compared to limited lymph node dissection (D1), and also D2 dissection helps in staging cancer more accurately.[13],[14],[15]
There are many controversies regarding the best reconstruction methods after total gastrectomy. The Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy is a simple option for reconstruction. Recent advances include jejunal pouch reconstruction. The study conducted by Chen et al. in a teaching hospital in China revealed a better quality of life, lower incidence of dumping syndrome, and better nutritional and evaluation status.[6]
Conclusion | |  |
Gastric carcinoma is cancer in the fifth to seventh decades with male preponderance. The report highlights the importance of suspecting gastric carcinoma in an elderly male even with trivial symptoms. Early detection helps in linked with better prognosis and the treatment modality ranges from endoscopic resection of tumor to total gastrectomy. An expertise decision is required in assessing the treatment modality suitable to the patient. Here, in this case, jejunal pouch reconstruction was performed for a better postoperative quality of life.
Informed consent
Taken from the patient.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Acknowledgment
Our sincere thanks to Squad Medicine and Research for their support and guidance.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, Mackey JR, Joy AA, Hamilton SM. Gastric adenocarcinoma: Review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg 2005;241:27-39. |
2. | Schwartz G. Invasion and metastasis in gastric cancer: In vitro and in vivo models with clinical considerations. Semin Oncol 1996;23:316-24. |
3. | Al-Amri AM. Long-term survival of gastric adenocarcinoma without therapy: Case report. Oman Med J 2010;25:303-5. |
4. | Dupont BJ Jr., Cohn I Jr. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Curr Probl Cancer 1980;4:1-46. |
5. | |
6. | Chen W, Jiang X, Huang H, Ding Z, Li C. Jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy is associated with better short-term absorption capacity and quality of life in early-stage gastric cancer patients. BMC Surg 2018;18:63. |
7. | Bedikian AY, Chen TT, Khankhanian N, Heilbrun LK, McBride CM, McMurtrey MJ, et al. The natural history of gastric cancer and prognostic factors influencing survival. J Clin Oncol 1984;2:305-10. |
8. | Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harrahs A, Edwards BK. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1973-1994, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 97-2789. Bethesda: Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. |
9. | Alberts SR, Cervantes A, van de Velde CJ. Gastric cancer: Epidemiology, pathology and treatment. Ann Oncol 2003;14 Suppl 2:i31-6. |
10. | Sadowski DC, Rabeneck L. Gastric ulcers at endoscopy: Brush, biopsy, or both? Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:608-13. |
11. | Heberer G, Teichmann RK, Krämling HJ, Günther B. Results of gastric resection for carcinoma of the stomach: the European experience. World J Surg. 1988;12:374-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01655678. |
12. | Gore RM. Gastric cancer. Clinical and pathologic features. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:295-310. |
13. | Onate-Ocana LF, Aiello-Crocifoglio V, Mondragon-Sanchez R, Ruiz-Molina JM. Survival benefit of D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:210-7. |
14. | Otsuji E, Toma A, Kobayashi S, Okamoto K, Hagiwara A, Yamagishi H. Outcome of prophylactic radical lymphadenectomy with gastrectomy in patients with early gastric carcinoma without lymph node metastasis. Cancer 2000;89:1425-30. |
15. | Nakamura K, Ueyama T, Yao T, Xuan ZX, Ambe K, Adachi Y, et al. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy. Cancer 1992;70:1030-7. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|